|
||||||
| ebd Blinded By Science..... - well at least maybe when I've finished writing it! | ||||||
| Just a start!!! - Perhaps Matt will stop getting upset for a bit now! | ||||||
< |
Where: F = Force, (Newtons, N) |
|||||
If R/L > 0.3 Then it is accurate enough to use 1st 2 Terms CSA Of Rod = 1.075391x10-4 m2 |
||||||
Mass
of Piston: |
||||||
OEM = 395g = 0.395kg Wosner = 315g = 0.315kg |
||||||
Small
End Mass: |
||||||
ebd Modified Rods = 135.5g
= 0.1355kg |
||||||
Total
Reciprocating Mass: |
||||||
Original = 0.5305kg ebd modified = 0.4505kg |
||||||
Piston Speed (average) |
||||||
Piston Speed (Maximum) |
||||||
Since we have the maximum acceleration of the piston & therefore the piston @ max rpm we can calculate the stress on the conrod. Also note that this shows that well designed rods do not fail under compression Where: Rod material Tensile strength = 430 N/mm2 (MPa )
|
||||||
Given max stress on |
||||||
Since we have the maximum acceleration of the piston & therefore the piston @ max rpm we can calculate the stress on the conrod. Also note that this shows that well designed rods do not fail under compression Where: |
||||||
Return to Navigation |
||||||
If you have randomly surfed in and need to find the navigation then just click here or on the Logo below:
|
||||||
